Utilization and outcomes of transcatheter coil embolization for various coronary artery lesions: Single‐center 12‐year experience

• Published in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions Vol. 98; no. 7; pp. 1317 - 1331
• Main Authors: Abdelfattah, Omar M., Saad, Anas M., Kassis, Nicholas, Shekhar, Shashank, Isogai, Toshiaki, Gad, Mohamed M., Ahuja, Keerat R., Hariri, Essa, Kaur, Manpreet, Farwati, Medhat, Khatri, Jaikirshan, Krishnaswamy, Amar, Kapadia, Samir R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.12.2021; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Adverse events; Coronary Angiography; Coronary artery; coronary artery aneurysm; coronary artery fistula; coronary perforation; Coronary Vessel Anomalies - therapy; Coronary vessels; Embolization; Embolization, Therapeutic - adverse effects; Endovascular coiling; Fistula - therapy; Humans; left internal mammary artery; Lesions; Pseudoaneurysm; Retrospective Studies; Stents; transcatheter coil embolization; Treatment Outcome; coronary artery aneurysm; transcatheter coil embolization; coronary perforation; coronary artery fistula; left internal mammary artery
• ISSN: 1522-1946; 1522-726X
• DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29381

Objective Determining the outcomes of transcatheter coil embolization (TCE) for several coronary artery lesions. Background TCE has been used as a treatment modality for various lesions in the coronary circulation. However, data on the efficacy and safety of TCE to treat coronary artery fistula (CAF), left internal mammary artery (LIMA) side‐branch, coronary artery perforation (CAP), coronary artery aneurysm (CAA), and coronary artery pseudoaneurysm (CAPA) are limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective, descriptive analysis of all TCE devices in coronary lesions at our center from 2007 to 2019. Forty‐one studied lesions included 25 CAF, 7 LIMA side‐branch, 5 CAP, 2 CAA, and 2 CAPA. Short‐ and 1‐year mortality and hospital readmission were reported, in addition to coil‐related complications and procedural success. Results The utilization rate of TCE in coronary artery lesions at our center was found to be 33.8 per 100,000 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures over 12 years. Successful angiographic closure was achieved in 37 out of 41 (87.8%) cases (88, 100, 60, 100, and 100% of CAF, LIMA side‐branch, CAP, CAA, and CAPA, respectively). No adverse events were directly related to TCE among the LIMA, CAA, and CAPA cases, and only one patient with CAF required reintervention at 3 months due to coil migration. Conclusions Coil embolization in our institution was safe and effective in treating different coronary circulation abnormalities with a 87.8% overall success rate. Further study on the use of vascular plug devices in cases such as CAF or LIMA side‐branch would be beneficial to understand the treatment options better.