Gaps in Guideline-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Secondary Prevention in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 322 153 Patients

• Published in: Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes Vol. 16; no. 8; pp. 533 - 543
• Main Authors: Navar, Ann Marie, Kolkailah, Ahmed A, Gupta, Anand, Gillard, Kristin Khalaf, Israel, Marc K, Wang, Yiqing, Peterson, Eric D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.2023
• Subjects: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases - prevention & control; Child, Preschool; Cholesterol, LDL; Ezetimibe - therapeutic use; Female; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - adverse effects; Male; Retrospective Studies; Secondary Prevention; United States - epidemiology; United States; underutilization; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; statin therapy
• ISSN: 1941-7713; 1941-7705; 1941-7705
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009787

Many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are not on guideline-recommended statin therapy. We evaluated utilization of statins and other lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), among patients with ASCVD over a 1-year period. LLT and LDL-C levels at the first outpatient visit (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2018) and 1-year follow-up were evaluated using data from Cerner Real-World Data, an electronic health record-derived data set from 92 US health systems. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with high-intensity statin use. We identified 322 153 patients with ASCVD (median age 69 years, 58.8% men, 81.8% White). Overall, 76.1% of patients were on statins, with only 39.4% on high-intensity statins. Men were more likely to receive high-intensity statins than women (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.30-1.38]). Increasing age was associated with lower odds of statin use (odds ratio, 0.79 per 5-year increase at 60 years [95% CI, 0.78-0.81]). Patients with peripheral artery disease (odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.37-0.42]) and cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.70-0.80]) had lower odds of using high-intensity statins than those with coronary artery disease. At baseline, most patients (61.3%) had elevated LDL-C (≥70 mg/dL), including 59.8% of those on low/moderate-intensity statins and 76.1% on no statin; only 45.3% achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL at 1 year. Nonstatin LLT use was low (ezetimibe, 4.4%; proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, 0.7%). Among patients on no statin or low/moderate-intensity statin at baseline, 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively, were on high-intensity statins at 1 year. Among patients with ASCVD in routine care, high-intensity statins are underutilized, and uptitration and use of nonstatin therapy are uncommon. Women, older adults, and individuals with noncardiac ASCVD are particularly undertreated. Concerted efforts are needed to address therapeutic inertia for lipid management in patients with ASCVD.