Global comparison of benthic nepheloid layers based on 52 years of nephelometer and transmissometer measurements

•First global comparison of nepheloid layers from two data bases, covers 52 years.•Sites of strong/weak nepheloid layers in 1964–1984 are similar to those in 1979–2016.•Areas of strong nepheloid layers appear linked with upper ocean dynamics.•Benthic nepheloid layers weak/non-existent in most areas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProgress in oceanography Vol. 168; pp. 100 - 111
Main Authors Gardner, Wilford D., Jo Richardson, Mary, Mishonov, Alexey V., Biscaye, Pierre E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2018
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•First global comparison of nepheloid layers from two data bases, covers 52 years.•Sites of strong/weak nepheloid layers in 1964–1984 are similar to those in 1979–2016.•Areas of strong nepheloid layers appear linked with upper ocean dynamics.•Benthic nepheloid layers weak/non-existent in most areas of low eddy kinetic energy. Global maps of maximum bottom particle concentration, benthic nepheloid layer thickness, and integrated particle mass in benthic nepheloid layers (BNL) based on 2412 global profiles collected using the Lamont Thorndike nephelometer from 1964 to 1984 are compared with maps of those same properties compiled from 6392 global profiles measured by transmissometers from 1979 to 2016. Outputs from both instruments were converted to particulate matter concentration (PM). The purposes of this paper are to compare global differences and similarities in the location and intensity of BNLs measured with these two independent instruments over slightly overlapping decadal time periods, to combine the data sets in order to expand the time scale of global in situ measurements of BNLs, and to gain insight about the factors creating/sustaining BNLs. The similarity between general locations of high and low particle concentration BNLs during the two time periods indicates that the driving forces of erosion and resuspension of bottom sediments are spatially persistent during recent decadal time spans, though in areas of strong BNLs, intensity is highly episodic. Topography and well-developed current systems play a role. These maps will help to understand deep ocean sediment dynamics, linkage with upper ocean dynamics, the potential for scavenging of adsorption-prone elements near the seafloor, and provide a comprehensive comparison of these data sets on a global scale. During both time periods, BNLs are weak or absent in most of the Pacific, Indian, and Atlantic basins away from continental margins. High surface eddy kinetic energy is associated with the Kuroshio Current east of Japan. Both data sets show weak BNLs south of the Kuroshio, but no transmissometer data have been collected beneath the Kuroshio itself. Sparse nephelometer data show moderate BNLs just north of the Kuroshio Extension, but with much lower concentrations than beneath the Gulf Stream. Strong BNLs are found in areas where eddy kinetic energy in overlying waters, mean kinetic energy near bottom, and energy dissipation within the bottom boundary layer are high. Areas of strongest BNLs include the Western North Atlantic, Argentine Basin (South Atlantic), areas around South Africa tied to the Agulhas Current region, and somewhat random locations in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current of the Southern Ocean.
ISSN:0079-6611
1873-4472
DOI:10.1016/j.pocean.2018.09.008