Effects of Large-Scale Municipal Safe Routes to School Infrastructure on Student Active Travel and Physical Activity: Design, Methods, and Baseline Data of the Safe Travel Environment Evaluation in Texas Schools (STREETS) Natural Experiment

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 19; no. 3; p. 1810
• Main Authors: Hoelscher, Deanna M, Ganzar, Leigh Ann, Salvo, Deborah, Kohl, 3rd, Harold W, Pérez, Adriana, Brown, Henry Shelton, Bentley, Sarah S, Dooley, Erin E, Emamian, Amir, Durand, Casey P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 05.02.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Bicycling; Children & youth; Commuting; Costs; Cross-Sectional Studies; Demography; Design; Engineering; Environment Design; Evaluation; Exercise; Experiments; Funding; Humans; Hypotheses; Infrastructure; Physical activity; Prospective Studies; Residence Characteristics; Schools; Students; Texas; Transportation - methods; Travel; Walking; Texas; United States > US; active commuting; natural experiment; Safe Routes to School; children; physical activity
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031810

Past evaluations of Safe Routes to School (SRTS) programs have been relatively small in scope and have lacked objective measurements of physical activity. A 2016 Mobility Bond in Austin, Texas, USA, allocated USD 27.5 million for infrastructure changes to facilitate active commuting to schools (ACS). The Safe TRavel Environment Evaluation in Texas Schools (STREETS) study aims to determine the health effects of these infrastructure changes. The purpose of this paper is to describe the STREETS study design, methods, and selected baseline results. The STREETS study is comprised of two designs: (1) a serial cross-sectional design to assess changes in ACS prevalence, and (2) a quasi-experimental, prospective cohort to examine changes in physical activity. Differences between study arms (Austin SRTS and comparison) were assessed for school demographics, ACS, and school programs. At baseline, 14.3% of school trips were made by ACS, with non-significant differences between study arms. Only 26% of schools implemented ACS-related programs. Some significant differences across SRTS and comparison schools were identified for several school- and neighborhood-level characteristics. Substantial changes are needed across area schools and neighborhoods to promote optimum ACS. STREETS study longitudinal findings will be critical for informing optimal future implementations of SRTS programs.