Functional versus folding landscapes: the same yet different

Protein functional landscapes are characterized by a modest number of states compared with the folding landscapes, allowing brute force sampling of these states for smaller proteins using computer simulations. On the other hand, because the functional landscape topographies are complicated, the nati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent opinion in structural biology Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 16 - 22
Main Authors Zhuravlev, Pavel I, Papoian, Garegin A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2010
Subjects
Allosteric Regulation
Protein Binding
Protein Folding
Proteins - chemistry
Proteins - metabolism
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Protein functional landscapes are characterized by a modest number of states compared with the folding landscapes, allowing brute force sampling of these states for smaller proteins using computer simulations. On the other hand, because the functional landscape topographies are complicated, the native state dynamics are often difficult to interpret. Nevertheless, a number of experimental and computational techniques have recently emerged that are designed to reveal the essential features of the native landscape, such as the hierarchical organization of conformational substates. These studies also shed light on the mechanisms of protein function, for example, explaining how chemical energy is transduced in molecular motors. Overall, interpreting experimental results in the light of the functional landscape paradigm considerably enhances the understanding of complex biomolecular processes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ISSN:0959-440X
1879-033X
DOI:10.1016/j.sbi.2009.12.010