Poor Glycaemic Control and Arrhythmias

Objective. To evaluate number, type, and complexity of arrhythmias in diabetics compared with controls and, among diabetics, comparing good glycaemic control (GGC) and poor glycaemic control (PGC) patients. Methods. We compared Ambulatory Electrocardiogram recordings of 92 diabetics and 100 controls...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEndocrine research Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 206 - 214
Main Authors Arnò, Raffaella, Bastagli, Luciana, Martignani, Cristian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Informa Healthcare 01.01.2013
Taylor & Francis
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective. To evaluate number, type, and complexity of arrhythmias in diabetics compared with controls and, among diabetics, comparing good glycaemic control (GGC) and poor glycaemic control (PGC) patients. Methods. We compared Ambulatory Electrocardiogram recordings of 92 diabetics and 100 controls. The glycaemic profile of 50 diabetics, taken the same day as the Ambulatory ECG recording, was subdivided into GGC (gluco-stick mean values between 100 and 140 mg/dL) or PGC (gluco-stick values ≤99 mg/dL in 3-of-4 daily determination or gluco-stick values ≥140 mg/dL in 3-of-4 daily determination). Results. Diabetics show a higher prevalence of either ventricular ectopic beats (VEBs) (93.47% vs. 82% controls, p < 0.05) and heart rate (both in sinus rhythm and in atrial fibrillation) (98.35 ± 10 beats/min in diabetics vs. 78.10 ± 8.1 in controls, p < 0.001). Moreover, diabetics with PGC show either a higher prevalence of VEBs (96.42% vs 77.27% in GGC, p < 0.05) and of supraventricular ectopic beats (SVEBs) (96.42% vs. 68.18 in GGC, p < 0.05); furthermore, diabetics with PGC show more severe and complex atrial and ventricular arrhythmias (SVEBs 32.14% vs 0%, p < 0.05; VEBs 39.28% vs 9.09%, p < 0.05). Conclusions. The analysis of our sample shows that the arrhythmogenic condition is not only provided from diabetic condition per se but it is enhanced in PGC. Infact PGC patients showed higher number of VEBs, often polymorphic, expression of more severe arrhythmic and cardiovascular outcome. This could be partially explained by hyperactivation of autonomic nervous system during metabolic stress (which increases mean heart rate). Moreover more severe diabetic patients may present coronary microangiopathy that can further explain their arrhythmogenic tendency.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0743-5800
1532-4206
DOI:10.3109/07435800.2013.767268