Combining Place and Rate of Stimulation Improves Frequency Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users

• Published in: Hearing research Vol. 424; p. 108583
• Main Authors: Bissmeyer, Susan R.S., Goldsworthy, Raymond L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.10.2022
• Subjects: Acoustic Stimulation; Auditory neuroscience; Cochlear implant; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Cochlear Nerve; Electric Stimulation; Pitch; Pitch Perception; Psychophysics; Cochlear implant; Pitch; Psychophysics; Auditory neuroscience
• ISSN: 0378-5955; 1878-5891; 1878-5891
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108583

•Frequency discrimination is better with covaried stimulation rate and place.•Place pitch changes of 15% were discriminable with optimized frequency allocation.•Frequency discrimination was better when provided by single-electrode stimulation.•Sharper frequency tuning (forward masking) correlated with frequency discrimination.•Relatively narrow stimulation may provide better access to place and rate cues. In the auditory system, frequency is represented as tonotopic and temporal response properties of the auditory nerve. While these response properties are inextricably linked in normal hearing, cochlear implants can separately excite tonotopic location and temporal synchrony using different electrodes and stimulation rates, respectively. This separation allows for the investigation of the contributions of tonotopic and temporal cues for frequency discrimination. The present study examines frequency discrimination in adult cochlear implant users as conveyed by electrode position and stimulation rate, separately and combined. The working hypothesis is that frequency discrimination is better provided by place and rate cues combined compared to either cue alone. This hypothesis was tested in two experiments. In the first experiment, frequency discrimination needed for melodic contour identification was measured for frequencies near 100, 200, and 400 Hz using frequency allocation modeled after clinical processors. In the second experiment, frequency discrimination for pitch ranking was measured for frequencies between 100 and 1600 Hz using an experimental frequency allocation designed to provide better access to place cues. The results of both experiments indicate that frequency discrimination is better with place and rate cues combined than with either cue alone. These results clarify how signal processing for cochlear implants could better encode frequency into place and rate of electrical stimulation. Further, the results provide insight into the contributions of place and rate cues for pitch.