The ubiquitous paddle-wheel building block in two-dimensional coordination polymers with square grid structure
This work describes design of a series of new paddle-wheel binuclear clusters containing 2-D coordination polymers based on ditopic carboxylate linkers, 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (BDC) or 2-amino,1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (Am-BDC). The strategic use of strongly coordinating base/solvent as blocking li...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of coordination chemistry Vol. 69; no. 11-13; pp. 1957 - 1969 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Taylor & Francis
02.07.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This work describes design of a series of new paddle-wheel binuclear clusters containing 2-D coordination polymers based on ditopic carboxylate linkers, 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (BDC) or 2-amino,1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (Am-BDC). The strategic use of strongly coordinating base/solvent as blocking ligand to restrict the structure in 2-D space is explored, and the role of organic base on the overall structure formation is further elaborated. The isostructural [Zn(BDC)(Py)]
n
(1) and [Co(BDC(Py)]
n
(2) were formed by the use of strong base pyridine (Py) as a blocking ligand whereas reaction using N-methylimidazole (Mim) in place of pyridine gives [Co(BDC)(Mim)]
n
(3) with similar topology and coordination environment. The use of weak/non-coordinating base such as 2-chloropyrimidine, pyrazine, and tetramethylammoniumhexafluorophosphate [(CH
3
)
4
N(PF
6
)] gives the DMF-coordinated 2-D frameworks, [Cu(BDC)(DMF)]
n
(4), [Zn(BDC)(DMF)]
n
(5), and [Zn(AmBDC)(DMF)]
n
(6). All the structures crystallize in monoclinic crystal system yielding 2-D nets with square grid 4
4
topology and solid state 3-D structure via extensive non-covalent supramolecular interactions. Surface area analysis via N
2
adsorption of three representative 2-D coordination polymers, 1, 4, and 6, indicate that 4 has a surface area of 450 m
2
g
−1
which is a signature of microporosity, while 1 and 6 have moderate (161.6 m
2
g
−1
) and negligible (33 m
2
g
−1
) surface areas, respectively. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0095-8972 1029-0389 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00958972.2016.1190839 |