Sex Prevalence of Pediatric Kidney Stone Disease in the United States: An Epidemiologic Investigation

Objectives To define the sex prevalence of inpatient hospital discharges for pediatric patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract stone disease. Methods The study examined inpatient admissions for pediatric urolithiasis in 2003, using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUrology (Ridgewood, N.J.) Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 104 - 107
Main Authors Novak, Thomas E, Lakshmanan, Yegappan, Trock, Bruce J, Gearhart, John P, Matlaga, Brian R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives To define the sex prevalence of inpatient hospital discharges for pediatric patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract stone disease. Methods The study examined inpatient admissions for pediatric urolithiasis in 2003, using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database. We used the International Classification of Disease , 9th edition, Clinical Modification codes, to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of renal (592.0) or ureteral (592.1) calculi. Sex prevalence was assessed, and the results were stratified by age group. Results In the 2003 Kids' Inpatient Database, the sex distribution among pediatric patients with stone formation varied significantly by age. In the first decade of age, a male predominance was found that had shifted to a female predominance in the second decade. Overall, however, girls in the pediatric population were more commonly affected by stones than were boys. Conclusions In this nationally representative sample, the sex distribution of pediatric urolithiasis varied with age, with boys more commonly affected in the first decade of age and girls in the second decade. Although the reason for this unique epidemiologic finding is not readily apparent, additional studies can build on this hypothesis-generating work.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.079