The Impact of Coworkers' Safety Violations on an Individual Worker: A Social Contagion Effect within the Construction Crew

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 15; no. 4; p. 773
• Main Authors: Liang, Huakang, Lin, Ken-Yu, Zhang, Shoujian, Su, Yikun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 17.04.2018; MDPI
• Subjects: Adult; Behavior; China; Construction; Construction accidents & safety; Construction Industry; Electronic health records; Female; Human error; Humans; Industrial safety; Male; Middle Aged; Model testing; Motivation; Occupational Health; Occupational safety; Pressure; Safety; Social Behavior; Social interactions; Supervisors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Violations; Work environment; Workers; Young Adult; China; United States > US; social contagion; social information processing; social learning; routine safety violations; situational safety violations
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040773

This research developed and tested a model of the social contagion effect of coworkers' safety violations on individual workers within construction crews. Both situational and routine safety violations were considered in this model. Empirical data were collected from 345 construction workers in China using a detailed questionnaire. The results showed that both types of safety violations made by coworkers were significantly related to individuals' perceived social support and production pressure. Individuals' attitudinal ambivalence toward safety compliance mediated the relationships between perceived social support and production pressure and both types of individuals' safety violations. However, safety motivation only mediated the effects of perceived social support and production pressure on individuals' situational safety violations. Further, this research supported the differences between situational and routine safety violations. Specifically, we found that individuals were more likely to imitate coworkers' routine safety violations than their situational safety violations. Coworkers' situational safety violations had an indirect effect on individuals' situational safety violations mainly through perceived social support and safety motivation. By contrast, coworkers' routine safety violations had an indirect effect on individuals' routine safety violations mainly through perceived production pressure and attitudinal ambivalence. Finally, the theoretical and practical implications, research limitations, and future directions were discussed.