Optimizing Management Practices under Straw Regimes for Global Sustainable Agricultural Production

• Published in: Agronomy (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 3; p. 710
• Main Authors: Li, Pengfei, Zhang, Afeng, Huang, Shiwei, Han, Jiale, Jin, Xiangle, Shen, Xiaogang, Hussain, Qaiser, Wang, Xudong, Zhou, Jianbin, Chen, Zhujun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.03.2023
• Subjects: Agricultural production; carbon and nitrogen components; Carbon content; Carbon dioxide; Carbon sequestration; Carbon/nitrogen ratio; Climate change; Climate change mitigation; Crop yield; different farming regimes; Ecological effects; Emission measurements; Emissions; Fertilizers; Food security; Food supply; Global warming; Global warming potential; Greenhouse effect; greenhouse gas emissions; Greenhouse gases; Meta-analysis; Methane; net global warming potential; Nitrogen; Nitrous oxide; Optimization; Soil fertility; Soil improvement; Soils; Strategic planning (Business); Straw; straw input; Sustainable agriculture; Tillage; China
• ISSN: 2073-4395; 2073-4395
• DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13030710

Straw input is a helpful approach that potentially improves soil fertility and crop yield to ensure food security and protect the ecological environment. Nevertheless, unreasonable straw input results in massive greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, leading to climate change and global warming. To explore the optimum combination of straw input and management practices for achieving green agricultural production, a worldwide data set was created using 3452 comparisons from 323 publications using the meta-analysis method. Overall, straw input increased soil carbon and nitrogen components as compared with no straw input. Additionally, straw input significantly boosted crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by 8.86% and 22.72%, respectively, with low nitrogen fertilizer rate benefiting the most. The cumulative of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions increased by 24.81%, 79.30%, and 28.31%, respectively, when straw was added. Global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse emission intensity (GHGI) increased with the application of straw, whereas net global warming potential (NGWP) decreased owing to soil carbon sequestration. Low straw input rate, straw mulching, application of straw with C/N ratio > 30, long-term straw input, and no-tillage combined with straw input all result in lower GHG emissions. The GWP and GHGI were strongly related to area-scaled CH4 emissions, but the relationship with N2O emissions was weak. Straw application during the non-rice season is the most important measure for reducing CH4 emissions in paddy–upland fields. An optimum straw management strategy coupled with local conditions can help in climate change mitigation while also promoting sustainable agricultural production.