A Comparative Study of Behavior Problems among Left-Behind Children, Migrant Children and Local Children

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 15; no. 4; p. 655
• Main Authors: Hu, Hongwei, Gao, Jiamin, Jiang, Haochen, Jiang, Haixia, Guo, Shaoyun, Chen, Kun, Jin, Kaili, Qi, Yingying
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.04.2018; MDPI
• Subjects: Adolescent; Age; Behavior; Child; Child Health; Children; Children & youth; China; Comparative studies; Correlation analysis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Environmental factors; Families & family life; Female; Health Surveys; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Mental health; Migration; Parents & parenting; Problem Behavior - psychology; Psychology, Child; Regression analysis; Risk taking; Schools; Social research; Studies; Teenagers; Transients and Migrants - psychology; China; Beijing China; left-behind children; migrant children; behavioral problems
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040655

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of behavioral problems among left-behind children, migrant children and local children in China, and to compare the risks of behavioral problems among the three types of children. Data on 4479 children aged 6-16 used in this study were from a survey conducted in China in 2017. The school-age version of the Children Behavior Checklist was used to measure children's behavioral problems. Descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, and logistic regressions were conducted. The prevalence of behavioral problems was 18.80% and 13.59% for left-behind children and migrant children, respectively, both of which were higher than that of local children. Logistic regression analysis showed that after adjustments for individual and environmental variables, the likelihood of total, internalizing and externalizing behavior problems for left-behind children and migrant children were higher than those for local children; left-behind children had a higher likelihood of internalizing problems than externalizing problems, while migrant children had a higher prevalence of externalizing problems. Left-behind children had a higher prevalence of each specific syndrome than migrant and local children. Both individual and environmental factors were associated with child behavioral problems, and family migration may contribute to the increased risks. Left-behind and migrant children were more vulnerable than local children to behavioral problems.