Fundoplications resist reflux independent of in vivo anatomic relationships

BACKGROUND: Antireflux operations restore lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function and hiatal anatomy; however, the relative contributions are unclear. METHODS: We measured the competency of fundoplications, exclusive of in vivo variables, in gastroesophageal explants from 8 cadavers. Using a multi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 177; no. 2; pp. 107 - 110
Main Authors Farrell, Timothy M, Smith, C.Daniel, Metreveli, Ramaz E, Richardson, William S, Johnson, Alfred B, Hunter, John G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.1999
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND: Antireflux operations restore lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function and hiatal anatomy; however, the relative contributions are unclear. METHODS: We measured the competency of fundoplications, exclusive of in vivo variables, in gastroesophageal explants from 8 cadavers. Using a multichannel manometer, esophageal, LES, and intragastric pressures were recorded during transpyloric distension. Data were compared at baseline, and after Nissen (360°) and Toupet (270°) fundoplications. RESULTS: Before fundoplication, stomachs refluxed immediately upon distension. Nissen fundoplications never refluxed before gastric rupture (46.8 ± 15.0 mm Hg). LES pressure averaged 2.0 ± 0.5 times intragastric pressure during distension. Toupet fundoplications refluxed at intragastric pressure <2 mm Hg, then became competent until gastric rupture (49.9 ± 15.0 mm Hg). LES pressure averaged 2.4 ± 1.0 times intragastric pressure during distension. CONCLUSIONS: Nissen and Toupet fundoplications increase LES pressure linearly at 2 to 2.5 times intragastric pressure, independent of in vivo variables. Toupet fundoplication lacks the competency of Nissen fundoplication at low intragastric pressures.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00313-4