Evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials with different structures and thicknesses using a digital radiography system

• Published in: Imaging science in dentistry Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 261 - 269
• Main Authors: Yaylacı, Ayla, Karaarslan, Emine Sirin, Hatırlı, Hüseyin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 01.09.2021; 대한영상치의학회
• Subjects: Original; 치의학; Radiography, Dental, Digital; Dental Materials
• ISSN: 2233-7822; 2233-7830
• DOI: 10.5624/isd.20200334

The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacities of various types of restorative materials with different thicknesses compared with enamel, dentin, and aluminum. Four bulk-fill resins, 2 hybrid ceramics, 2 micro-hybrid resin composites, 6 glass ionomer-based materials, 2 zinc phosphate cements, and an amalgam were used in the study. Twelve disk-shaped specimens were prepared from each of 17 restorative materials with thicknesses of 1 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm (n=4). All the restorative material specimens with the same thickness, an aluminum (Al) step wedge, and enamel and dentin specimens were positioned on a phosphor storage plate and exposed using a dental X-ray unit. The mean gray values were measured on digital images and converted to equivalent Al thicknesses. Statistical analyses were performed using 2-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test ( <0.05). Radiopacity was significantly affected by both the thickness and the material type ( <0.05). GCP Glass Fill had the lowest radiopacity value for samples of 1 mm thickness, while Vita Enamic had the lowest radiopacity value for 2-mm-thick and 4-mm-thick samples. The materials with the highest radiopacity values after the amalgam were zinc phosphate cements. Significant differences were observed in the radiopacities of restorative materials with different thicknesses. Radiopacity was affected by both the material type and thickness.