Patterns of Post-Endodontic Restoration: A Nationwide Survey of Dentists in Turkey

Developments in materials and techniques, geographical locations, age, specialty, and affiliations of dental practitioners affect the preference of post-endodontic restoration. Thus, this survey aimed to evaluate the trends of dentists in Turkey in terms of post-endodontic restorations. An anonymous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 19; no. 3; p. 1794
Main Authors Usta, Sıla Nur, Cömert-Pak, Begüm, Karaismailoğlu, Eda, Eymirli, Ayhan, Deniz-Sungur, Derya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 04.02.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Developments in materials and techniques, geographical locations, age, specialty, and affiliations of dental practitioners affect the preference of post-endodontic restoration. Thus, this survey aimed to evaluate the trends of dentists in Turkey in terms of post-endodontic restorations. An anonymous survey containing 10 questions regarding demographics, post-endodontic restoration patterns, and factors affecting restoration selection was electronically delivered to the dentists registered in the database of the Turkish Dental Association. The data were analyzed using by a chi-square test and ordinal logistic regression analysis. A total of 1093 surveys from 20,564 participants were collected with a response rate of 5.3%. Half of the participants (52%) preferred composite resins for post-endodontic restorations. Usage of posts was less prevalent amongst prosthodontists and dentists with clinical experience of more than 20 years compared to endodontists ( < 0.001) and dentists with clinical experience of less than 5 years ( = 0.004). More than half of the participants (56%) utilized fiber posts. Composite resins and fiber posts were the most common preferences in post-endodontic restoration. Endodontists had a higher tendency to use posts than prosthodontists and general dental practitioners.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
DOI:10.3390/ijerph19031794