Bioprinting of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models: A review

Recent years have witnessed significant progress in skeletal muscle tissue regeneration. Numerous bioengineering approaches have been implemented to construct in vitro skeletal muscle tissues with high fidelity. Nevertheless, an in vitro model that is capable of restoring mature muscle, vasculature,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials & design Vol. 193; p. 108794
Main Authors Zhuang, Pei, An, Jia, Chua, Chee Kai, Tan, Lay Poh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recent years have witnessed significant progress in skeletal muscle tissue regeneration. Numerous bioengineering approaches have been implemented to construct in vitro skeletal muscle tissues with high fidelity. Nevertheless, an in vitro model that is capable of restoring mature muscle, vasculature, and ECM composition to the damaged tissue has yet to be achieved. Herein, we critically review the development and progress in tissue engineering skeletal muscle models. We outline the physiology of native skeletal muscle and the design criteria of engineering biomimetic skeletal muscle tissues are discussed. The influential parameters that modulating skeletal muscle cell behavior are highlighted. Subsequently, we critically review the 3D skeletal muscle models using various bioengineering strategies, including 3D geometrical confinement, electrospinning, porous hydrogels, the controlled cell/molecule delivery, and particularly, 3D bioprinting technology. We draw on specific examples to discuss the merits and limitations of each method. A short description of the challenges and future directions is provided. [Display omitted] •Recent progress in engineering skeletal muscle models are thoroughly reviewed.•Design considerations for engineering skeletal muscles are presented.•Effects of different stimulus on cellular behavior are discussed.•Bioengineering strategies, especially bioprinting, for 3D skeletal muscle modeling are investigated.•The major challenges and opportunities are highlighted.
ISSN:0264-1275
1873-4197
DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108794