Determination of Selected Chemical Levels in Room Air and on Surfaces after the Use of Cartridge- and Tank-Based E-Vapor Products or Conventional Cigarettes

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 14; no. 9; p. 969
• Main Authors: Liu, Jianmin, Liang, Qiwei, Oldham, Michael, Rostami, Ali, Wagner, Karl, Gillman, I., Patel, Piyush, Savioz, Rebecca, Sarkar, Mohamadi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 28.08.2017; MDPI
• Subjects: Adult; Aerosols; Air Pollutants - analysis; Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis; Chemicals; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems - methods; Female; Glycerol; Humans; Hydrocarbons; Male; Middle Aged; Nicotine; Outdoor air quality; Public health; Smoking; Studies; Tobacco; Tobacco Products; VOCs; Volatile organic compounds; Young Adult; United States > US; passive vaping; room air chemicals; electronic vapor products; nicotine; propylene glycol; electronic cigarettes; thirdhand exposure; secondhand smoke; glycerol; conventional cigarettes
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14090969

There is an ongoing debate regarding the potential of secondhand exposure of non-users to various chemicals from use of e-vapor products (EVPs). Room air levels of 34 chemicals (nicotine, propylene glycol (PG), glycerol, 15 carbonyl chemicals, 12 volatile organic chemicals (VOCs), and four selected trace elements) were measured where EVPs and cigarettes were used by n = 37 healthy adult tobacco users in an exposure chamber. The products used were MarkTen® 2.5% Classic (Group I), a Prototype GreenSmoke® 2.4% (Group II), Ego-T® Tank with subjects’ own e-liquids (Group III) and subjects’ own conventional cigarettes (Group IV). Products were used under controlled conditions and 4-h ad libitum use. Background (without subjects) and baseline levels (with subjects) were measured. Cumulative 4-h. levels of nicotine, PG and glycerol measured were several-fold below the time-weighted average limits used in workplace exposure evaluation. Most the other chemicals (>75%) were at or below the limit of quantification during EVP use. Significant levels of chemicals (17 out of 34) were observed in Group IV. Overall, our results indicate that under the study conditions with the products tested, cumulative room air levels of the selected chemicals measured over 4-h were relatively small and were several-fold below the current occupational regulatory and consensus limits.