Reduction of Management Costs and Avoidance of Air Release of Carcinogens Through a Waste Segregation Program in a Brazilian Medical Institution

Hospital waste management is a current sustainability challenge. Although not always performed, the most applied approach in current protocols is the proper segregation of waste. The incineration of hospital waste is an significant source of emission of specific toxic particles and gases. We highlig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in public health Vol. 8; p. 583962
Main Authors Cesario, Fabiane Kellem Oliveira, Fontoura, Renata Pereira, da Conceição Junior, Amarildo Henrique, Cruz, Amanda Gentil, Nimer, Nidah Fawzi Said, Morais, Poliana Brito, Omena, Brenda Monteiro, Dos Santos, Edivaldo Bazilio, Silvestrini, Anderson Arantes, Andrade, Rosângela Vieira
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 07.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hospital waste management is a current sustainability challenge. Although not always performed, the most applied approach in current protocols is the proper segregation of waste. The incineration of hospital waste is an significant source of emission of specific toxic particles and gases. We highlighted dioxins, whose representatives have been considered carcinogenic agents since 1994. Several experimental and epidemiologic studies have shown greater cancer morbidity and mortality associated with dioxin exposure. In the present study, we presented the impact of a hospital waste management program implemented in an oncology institution based on proper segregation and consequent reduction of incinerated mass. Data were collected for 8 years and the waste was separated into five categories: infectious (A4), chemical (B), recyclable (DR), non-recyclable (DNR), and sharps (E). The classes addressed to incineration were A4, B, and E. A team education starting from the admission process and with a continued education program was essential for a successfully implemented program. We achieved a 66% saving of waste from incineration, equivalent to 76 tons, of which 71.9 tons corresponded to recyclable waste. If the waste separation protocol was not implemented, the biohazardous and chemical material would contaminate the rest of the residues, making incineration as a final destination mandatory for all the waste. This scenario would result in significantly more dioxins release and a 64% higher cost of waste management. This low-cost implementation measure was effective in the cost reduction of waste management and minimization of air release of human carcinogens.
Bibliography:Edited by: Mohiuddin Md. Taimur Khan, Washington State University Tri-Cities, United States
Reviewed by: Mosharraf Sarker, Teesside University, United Kingdom; Gabriel Gulis, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
This article was submitted to Environmental Health, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
ISSN:2296-2565
2296-2565
DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.583962