Method comparison of EMIT 700 and EMIT II with RIA for drug screening

• Published in: Journal of analytical toxicology Vol. 18; no. 2; p. 110
• Main Authors: Armbruster, D A, Schwarzhoff, R H, Pierce, B L, Hubster, E C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.03.1994
• Subjects: Calibration; Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Humans; Predictive Value of Tests; Radioimmunoassay; Substance Abuse Detection - methods
• ISSN: 0146-4760
• DOI: 10.1093/jat/18.2.110

The EMIT 700 and EMIT II assays for marijuana, cocaine, opiates, barbiturates, and phencyclidine, as performed on a Hitachi 717 Analyzer, were compared with Roche Abuscreen RIA tests for high-volume drug abuse screening. The EMIT II kits offer some advantages over the EMIT 700 kits for testing large work loads. The EMIT II marijuana test in particular exhibits a calibration curve that promises improved ability to separate negative from positive samples due to the increased absorbance rate separation between the negative and cutoff calibrators. Both EMIT formulations are preferable in terms of speed and ease of analysis in comparison with our laboratory's current RIA procedures. Over 50,000 urine samples were screened by EMIT 700 and RIA and by EMIT II and RIA. The performance of both EMIT assays was approximately equivalent to RIA in terms of their ability to detect urine samples that confirmed positive for cocaine and opiates. Both EMIT assays detected approximately 90% of the urine samples screened positive by RIA and confirmed positive for marijuana. Both EMIT assays performed better than RIA in detecting confirmed-positive barbiturate samples.