Understanding patient and physician responses to various cost-sharing programs for prescription drugs in South Korea: A multilevel analysis
Patient and/or physician responses are a pivotal issue in designing rational cost-sharing programs under health insurance systems. This study aims to understand patient and/or physician responses to cost-sharing programs designed for prescription drugs in South Korea. As a framework, we took advanta...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in public health Vol. 10; p. 924992 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
31.08.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Patient and/or physician responses are a pivotal issue in designing rational cost-sharing programs under health insurance systems.
This study aims to understand patient and/or physician responses to cost-sharing programs designed for prescription drugs in South Korea.
As a framework, we took advantage of a tiered cost-sharing program, including from copayment to coinsurance (threshold 1) and reduced coinsurance (threshold 2). Given the hierarchical structure of prescriptions nested within patients, we utilized a multilevel analysis to assess effects of various cost-sharing programs on patient and/or physician responses using National Health Insurance claims data from 2018.
We found that a tiered cost-sharing program was effective in changing the behaviors of patients and/or physicians. Threshold 1 was found to be more effective than threshold 2 in changing their behaviors. At the prescription level, sensitivity to cost-sharing programs was associated with prescribed days of treatment and locations of prescription. In a similar vein, sensitivity to cost-sharing programs was associated with gender and age group of patients.
A simplified cost-sharing program with extended intervals should be considered to rationalize cost-sharing programs. Specifically, a cost-sharing program designed for long-term prescriptions for chronic diseases together with an emphasis on cost transparency is required to better guide price-conscious decisions by patients and/or physicians. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Tim Ensor, University of Leeds, United Kingdom This article was submitted to Public Health Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health Reviewed by: Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman's University, United States; Chanhyun Park, University of Texas at Austin, United States |
ISSN: | 2296-2565 2296-2565 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924992 |