Interspinous spacers for lumbar spinal stenosis: commentary on van den Akker-van Marle et al

COMMENTARY ON: van den Akker-van Marle ME, Moojen WA, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLAM, Peul WC, for the Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (SIPS). Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe spine journal Vol. 16; no. 6; pp. 711 - 713
Main Author Lurie, Jon D., MD, MS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2016
Subjects
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decompression, Surgical
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery
Nervous System Diseases - surgery
Orthopedics
Spinal Stenosis - surgery
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:COMMENTARY ON: van den Akker-van Marle ME, Moojen WA, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLAM, Peul WC, for the Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group (SIPS). Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis. Spine J 2016:16:702–10 ( in this issue ).
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:1529-9430
1878-1632
DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.084