Androgens inhibit the proliferation of a variant of the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP

The paradoxical androgen response of R2, a subline of the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, is described here. Two androgens (DHT and R1881) decreased, in a dose-dependent manner, R2 cell proliferation and [ 3H]thymidine incorporation. These ligand and cell specific effects were accompanied by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 67 - 76
Main Authors Joly-Pharaboz, Marie-O., Soave, Marie-C., Nicolas, Brigitte, Mebarki, Farida, Renaud, Mélanie, Foury, Olivier, Morel, Yves, Andre, Jean G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.10.1995
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The paradoxical androgen response of R2, a subline of the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP, is described here. Two androgens (DHT and R1881) decreased, in a dose-dependent manner, R2 cell proliferation and [ 3H]thymidine incorporation. These ligand and cell specific effects were accompanied by an increase in the metabolism of the vital dye MTT and in cell protein content. Both androgens increased the doubling time and the percentage of G 0-G 1 cells. No evidence of androgen-induced apoptosis was found. Cloning allowed the selection of two cell populations on the basis of the response to 10 nM of R1881. Long term culture of uncloned R2 cells with R1881 modified reversibly the pattern of androgen response. R2 was compared to the androgen-stimulated LNCaP-FGC subline to investigate the causes of their different androgen responsiveness. The androgen receptor (number, affinity for hormones and antihormones, sedimentation constant and molecular weight) and androgen receptor genes (exon size and exon 8 sequence) were found to be identical in the two sublines. EGF stimulated LNCaP-FGC but not R2. Both cells were slightly stimulated by basic FGF but were insensitive to IGF-I and TGF β1. In conclusion: (1) androgens inhibit the proliferation of R2 cells possibly by introducing a G 0-G 1 block; (2) this inhibition is incomplete because, at least in part, the R2 cell population is heterogeneous; (3) chronic androgen treatment induces reversible cell adaptation; and (4) there is no evidence that the loss of the classical stimulatory effect of androgen on cell proliferation and the gain of inhibitory effect are due to androgen receptor alteration or to a specific action of one of the four growth factors tested.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0960-0760
1879-1220
DOI:10.1016/0960-0760(95)00155-S