Understanding and diagnosing sexual dysfunction: Recent progress through psychophysiological and psychophysical methods

The psychophysiological method has been applied to the study of human sexual response for well over three decades. The value of this method in providing an objective, integrated approach to the understanding of sexual response, and more specifically sexual dysfunction, is presented. Selected results...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 201 - 209
Main Authors Rowland, David L., Slob, A.K.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 1995
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The psychophysiological method has been applied to the study of human sexual response for well over three decades. The value of this method in providing an objective, integrated approach to the understanding of sexual response, and more specifically sexual dysfunction, is presented. Selected results from recent studies using this methodology illustrate the complex relationships that emerge among cognitive, affective, and physiological components of the sexual response. In addition, data from a systematic study of the use of psychophysiological procedures as an aid in differential diagnosis are given as evidence that this methodology offers a further strategy for assessing problems such as erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Finally, recent findings utilizing sensory psychophysical procedures which relate subjective penile thresholds to sexual response and dysfunction are reviewed. Such procedures also study the interaction of physical/physiological systems with psychological events, and as such may be considered relevant to understanding the relationship between psychological and physiological aspects of sexual response.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/0149-7634(94)00061-5