Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria

Abstract Background context Although several publications in the last decade have proved equality in safety and efficacy of the total disc replacement (TDR) to the anterior fusion procedure in cervical spine, the claim that TDR may reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has not been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe spine journal Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 5 - 12
Main Authors Nunley, Pierce D., MD, Jawahar, Ajay, MD, MS, Cavanaugh, David A., MD, Gordon, Charles R., MD, Kerr, Eubulus J., MD, Utter, Phillip Andrew, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background context Although several publications in the last decade have proved equality in safety and efficacy of the total disc replacement (TDR) to the anterior fusion procedure in cervical spine, the claim that TDR may reduce the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has not been corroborated by clinical evidence. Purpose We attempt to predict the true incidence of symptomatic ASD after TDR surgery in the cervical spine at one or two levels at a median follow-up period of 4 years. Study design A total of 763 patients were screened to participate in four different Food and Drug Administration device exemption trials for artificial cervical disc replacement at three collaborating institutions. Two hundred seventy-one patients qualified and enrolled in the trials. One hundred seventy-three randomized to receive artificial disc replacement surgery, and 167 have completed a 4-year or longer follow-up. Outcome measures Patients experiencing cervical radiculopathy symptoms in the follow-up period were worked-up with clinical examinations, magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, and other diagnostic studies. Once a clinical correlation was established with the imaging evidence of adjacent segment degeneration, a careful record was maintained to document the subsequent medical and/or surgical treatment received by these patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the true incidence of and factors affecting the ASD after cervical disc replacement in these patients. Results Twenty-six patients (15.2%) were identified to satisfy our criteria for ASD at the median follow-up of 51 months, with the annual incidence of 3.1% as calculated by life tables. The actuarial 5-year freedom from ASD rate was 71.6%±0.6%, and the mean period for freedom from ASD was 70.4±2.1 months. Conclusions The incidence of symptomatic ASD after cervical TDR is 3.1% annually regardless of the patient's age, sex, smoking habits, and design of the TDR device. The presence of osteopenia and lumbar degenerative disease significantly increase the risk of developing ASD after anterior cervical surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1529-9430
1878-1632
DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.032