Gait abnormalities in chronic fatigue syndrome

To evaluate our clinical impression that patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) did not walk normally, we assessed gait kinematics at slow walking speeds (i.e., 0.45, 0.89 and 1.34 m/sec) and 30 m run time speeds on CFS patients and on a comparison group of sedentary controls. Run time was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the neurological sciences Vol. 131; no. 2; pp. 156 - 161
Main Authors Boda, Wanda L., Natelson, Benjamin H., Sisto, Sue Ann, Tapp, Walter N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier B.V 01.08.1995
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-510X
1878-5883
DOI10.1016/0022-510X(95)00108-E

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate our clinical impression that patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) did not walk normally, we assessed gait kinematics at slow walking speeds (i.e., 0.45, 0.89 and 1.34 m/sec) and 30 m run time speeds on CFS patients and on a comparison group of sedentary controls. Run time was significantly slower for CFS than control subjects ( p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction ( p < 0.01) between group and speed for maximum hip angle during stance and swing phase with hip angle being significantly larger at 1.34 m/sec for CFS than controls subjects for both cases ( p < 0.05). Knee flexion during stance and swing phases was significantly larger for controls than CFS subjects at 0.45 m/sec ( p < 0.01). Ratio of stride length divided by leg length was significantly larger for the control subjects than for the CFS subjects with differences occurring at 0.45 and 0.89 m/sec ( p < 0.01) but not 1.34 m/sec. The data indicate that CFS patients have gait abnormalities when compared to sedentary controls. These could be due to balance problems, muscle weakness, or central nervous system dysfunction; deciding which will require further research. Evaluation of gait may be a useful tool to measure outcome following therapeutic interventions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-510X
1878-5883
DOI:10.1016/0022-510X(95)00108-E