Politicizing African urban food systems: The contradiction of food governance in Rabat and Casablanca, Morocco
The governance of urban food supply in Morocco is subject to deep contradictions. It involves actors with diversified interests that are guided by sometimes divergent rationale. One of the main contradictions sets “modernization” against conservatism. The former aims to create new “westernized” whol...
Saved in:
Published in | Cities Vol. 97; p. 102528 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2020
Elsevier Science Ltd Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The governance of urban food supply in Morocco is subject to deep contradictions. It involves actors with diversified interests that are guided by sometimes divergent rationale. One of the main contradictions sets “modernization” against conservatism. The former aims to create new “westernized” wholesale markets, “upgrade” food products for export, traceability and safety, reduce the informal food trade and support large retailers. The latter aims to prevent sociopolitical destabilization, such as the risk of increasing prices, changes in the supply of food to keep up with demand and social unrest involving merchants and informal vendors.
Our analysis of this contradictory situation is divided into two parts. First, we review the evolution of Morocco's food policy since independence. Then we present the main actors involved in the governance of urban food systems. We show that urban food governance is still dominated by the Ministry of the Interior, but that the decentralization process is likely to encourage modernization. In the second part, we highlight the tension between the “conservative” central actors and the “modernizing” local actors, by analysing the current controversy over the reform of the wholesale markets, a crucial issue for African urban food systems, in Casablanca and Rabat.
•African urban food systems are shaped by a system of governance gathering diverse and sometimes antagonistic interests.•In Morocco, the main contradiction opposes a “conservative” paradigm to a “modernizing” paradigm.•While the conservative paradigm is still prevalent, decentralization is likely to favor the rise of the modernizing paradigm.•This contradiction of urban food policy raises issues of social justice regarding the future evolution of urban food systems. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0264-2751 1873-6084 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102528 |