Predicted creatinine clearance to evaluate glomerular filtration rate in black Caribbean subjects

Background and methods. Although Caribbean people have been a lesser‐studied ethnic group than other populations, they have a high burden of hypertension and renal disease. Because Caribbean people have a greater muscle mass than Caucasians, this study examined the accuracy of creatinine‐based estim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNephrology, dialysis, transplantation Vol. 18; no. 7; pp. 1307 - 1310
Main Authors Mpio, Ignace, Laville, Maurice, Hadj‐Aïssa, Aoumeur, Fauvel, Jean‐Pierre
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.07.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and methods. Although Caribbean people have been a lesser‐studied ethnic group than other populations, they have a high burden of hypertension and renal disease. Because Caribbean people have a greater muscle mass than Caucasians, this study examined the accuracy of creatinine‐based estimates (creatinine clearance; Ccr and Cockcroft–Gault formula; C‐G Cl) of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in 38 Caribbeans who were matched for age, gender, and GFR, with 38 Caucasian subjects. Patients were considered black Caribbean if at least one of two parents was of black Caribbean origin. GFR values ranging from 5 to 140 ml/min/1.73 m2 were measured by inulin clearance. Results were compared using linear correlations and the Bland and Altman methodology to provide better estimates of value dispersion. Results. Correlation coefficients between C‐G Cl and GFR were highly significant in both black Caribbean subjects (r=0.83, P<0.001) and Caucasians (r=0.84, P<0.001). Similar coefficients were obtained between Ccr and GFR (r=0.89, P<0.001 and r=0.90, P<0.001, respectively). In spite of these strong correlations, the Bland and Altman representation highlighted huge intra‐individual variations in GFR estimation by C‐G Cl and by Ccr in both ethnic groups. The underestimation of GFR by C‐G Cl was significant in black Caribbeans (−8.6±20 ml/min/1.73 m2, P<0.001) but not in Caucasians (−5.6±20.7 ml/min/1.73 m2). Ccr overestimation of GFR was significant both in Caribbeans (8.7±16.8 ml/min/1.73 m2, P<0.001) and in Caucasians (7.2±15.7 ml/min/1.73 m2, P<0.01). Conclusions. The C‐G formula for estimating GFR yields similar clinical values in black Caribbeans and in Caucasians, but the same limitations were observed in both ethnic groups.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-GQ047SKZ-B
PII:1460-2385
local:181307
istex:6FB9502A61332E4DD081BC39053EA96A75584EC6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfg158