Optimizing burn wound procedural pain control, efficiency, and satisfaction through integrated nurse and physician education

Herein, we report the results of a quality improvement project (QI). Following a review of the burn unit practices, a nursing-led, physician supported educational intervention regarding optimal timing, dosage, and indication for medications used during hydrotherapy, including midazolam and opioids,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBurns Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 702 - 708
Main Authors Fleishhacker, Zachary, Pedroza, Albert, Ong, Jia Ern, Ronkar, Nicolas, Weigel, Isaac, Janecek, Trinity, Wellsandt, Sarah A., Galet, Colette, Wibbenmeyer, Lucy
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Herein, we report the results of a quality improvement project (QI). Following a review of the burn unit practices, a nursing-led, physician supported educational intervention regarding optimal timing, dosage, and indication for medications used during hydrotherapy, including midazolam and opioids, was implemented. We hypothesized that such intervention would support improvement in both nurse and patient satisfaction with pain control management. Patients undergoing hydrotherapy were surveyed. Demographics, opioid dose prescribed (oral morphine equivalents), midazolam use, timing of administration, and adverse events were collected. Patient pain scores (1−10) before and after hydrotherapy and patient and nurse satisfaction scores (1−10) after hydrotherapy were collected. The pre- and post-education populations were compared. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Post-education, administration of opioids (59.1% v. 0%, p < 0.001) and midazolam (59.1% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.001) prior to hydrotherapy significantly improved, leading to fewer patients requiring rescue opioids during hydrotherapy (25% vs. 74%, p < 0.001). Hydrotherapy duration significantly decreased post-education (19 [13.3–30] min vs. 32 [18–43] min, p = 0.003). Nurses’ ratings of their patient’s pain control (9 [7.3–10] vs. 7.5 [6–9], p = 0.004) and ease of procedure (10 [9,10] vs. 9 [7.8–10], p = 0.037) significantly improved. Patients’ pain management satisfaction rating did not change, but the number of subjects rating their pain management as excellent tended to increase (36.4% vs. 20%, p = 0.077). Nursing led, physician supported, education can improve medication administration prior to and during hydrotherapy, increasing the ease of the procedure as well as staff satisfaction. •Quality improvement project aiming at improving procedural pain management.•Nursing-led, physician supported educational intervention.•Improves medication administration prior to and during hydrotherapy.•Increased ease of the procedure as well as staff satisfaction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Conceptualization: LW, SAW, CG, ZF, AP; Methodology: LW, SAW, CG, ZF, AP; Formal Analysis: CG; Data collection: ZF, AP, NR, JEO, IW, TJ; Data Curation: IW, TJ,ZF, AP CG; Writing—Original Draft: ZF, CG; Writing—Review & Editing: ZF, AP, CG, SAW, IW, NR, JEO,TJ, LW; Visualization: CG, IW; Supervision: LW, CG
Author Contributions
Equal Contributors
ISSN:0305-4179
1879-1409
1879-1409
DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2023.12.002