Gender-Linked Differences in the Incidental Memory of Children and Adults
The hunter–gatherer theory (M. Eals & I. Silverman, 1994,Ethology and Sociobiology,15, 95–105) predicts that females should have better incidental memory for objects and locations than males. We tested this prediction with 3- to 6-year-old children (Study 1) and adults (Study 2). In Study 1, 80...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of experimental child psychology Vol. 72; no. 4; pp. 305 - 328 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
San Diego, CA
Elsevier Inc
01.04.1999
Elsevier Elsevier BV |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-0965 1096-0457 |
DOI | 10.1006/jecp.1999.2492 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The hunter–gatherer theory (M. Eals & I. Silverman, 1994,Ethology and Sociobiology,15, 95–105) predicts that females should have better incidental memory for objects and locations than males. We tested this prediction with 3- to 6-year-old children (Study 1) and adults (Study 2). In Study 1, 80 children were asked to recognize 18 gender-stereotyped toys which they had previously seen in a playroom for 2 min. In Study 2, 40 adults were asked to recall the identity and location of 30 gender-stereotyped objects which they had previously seen in an office for 2 min. Analyses in both studies indicated that females and males remembered more toys or objects congruent with their own sex but that there was no overall advantage for females. Implications for the hunter–gatherer theory, gender-schema theory, and our understanding of the development of incidental memory are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-0965 1096-0457 |
DOI: | 10.1006/jecp.1999.2492 |