Structure–radical scavenging activity relationships of phenolic compounds from traditional Chinese medicinal plants

• Published in: Life sciences (1973) Vol. 78; no. 25; pp. 2872 - 2888
• Main Authors: Cai, Yi-Zhong, Mei Sun, Jie Xing, Luo, Qiong, Corke, Harold
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 15.05.2006
• Subjects: Coumarins; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - chemistry; Drugs, Chinese Herbal - pharmacology; Flavonoids; Free Radical Scavengers - chemistry; Free Radical Scavengers - pharmacology; Free Radicals - chemistry; Lignans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Molecular Structure; Phenolic acids; Phenolic compounds; Phenols - chemistry; Phenols - pharmacology; Plants, Medicinal - chemistry; Quinones; Radical scavenging activity; Stilbenes; Structure-Activity Relationship; Structure–activity relationships; Tannins; Traditional Chinese medicinal plants; Quinones; Traditional Chinese medicinal plants; Flavonoids; Tannins; Stilbenes; Lignans; Radical scavenging activity; Coumarins; Phenolic compounds; Structure–activity relationships; Phenolic acids
• ISSN: 0024-3205; 1879-0631
• DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.11.004

Traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer contain a wide variety of natural phenolic compounds with various structural features and possessing widely differing antioxidant activity. The structure–radical scavenging activity relationships of a large number of representative phenolic compounds (e.g., flavanols, flavonols, chalcones, flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, tannins, stilbenes, curcuminoids, phenolic acids, coumarins, lignans, and quinones) identified in the traditional Chinese medicinal plants were evaluated using the improved ABTS •+ and DPPH methods. Different categories of tested phenolics showed significant mean differences in radical scavenging activity. Tannins demonstrated the strongest activity, while most quinones, isoflavones, and lignans tested showed the weakest activity. This study confirmed that the number and position of hydroxyl groups and the related glycosylation and other substitutions largely determined radical scavenging activity of the tested phenolic compounds. The differences in radical scavenging activity were attributed to structural differences in hydroxylation, glycosylation and methoxylation. The ortho-dihydroxy groups were the most important structural feature of high activity for all tested phenolic compounds. Other structural features played a modified role in enhancing or reducing the activity. Within each class of phenolic compounds, the structure–activity relationship was elucidated and discussed. This study reveals the structure–activity relationships of a large series of representative natural phenolic compounds more systematically and fully than previous work. Structure–radical scavenging activity relationships of some natural phenolics identified in the medicinal plants were evaluated for the first time.