A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects

A meta-analysis of 63 peer-reviewed studies evaluated the ability of parent training programs to modify disruptive child behaviors and parental behavior and perceptions. This analysis extends previous work by directly comparing behavioral and nonbehavioral programs, evaluating follow-up effects, iso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical psychology review Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 86 - 104
Main Authors Lundahl, Brad, Risser, Heather J., Lovejoy, M. Christine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A meta-analysis of 63 peer-reviewed studies evaluated the ability of parent training programs to modify disruptive child behaviors and parental behavior and perceptions. This analysis extends previous work by directly comparing behavioral and nonbehavioral programs, evaluating follow-up effects, isolating dependent variables expressly targeted by parent training, and examining moderators. Effects immediately following treatment for behavioral and nonbehavioral programs were small to moderate. For nonbehavioral programs, insufficient studies precluded examining follow-up effects. For behavioral programs, follow-up effects were small in magnitude. Parent training was least effective for economically disadvantaged families; importantly, such families benefited significantly more from individually delivered parent training compared to group delivery. Including children in their own therapy, separate from parent training, did not enhance outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-7358
1873-7811
DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.004