Adherence to study medication and visits: Data from the BABY HUG trial
Background Subject retention and adherence are essential to maintain the power and validity of the Pediatric Hydroxyurea Phase III Clinical Trial (BABY HUG). We designed a study to assess adherence with study medication administration and study visits and to evaluate socioeconomic factors (SES) that...
Saved in:
Published in | Pediatric blood & cancer Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 260 - 264 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.02.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Subject retention and adherence are essential to maintain the power and validity of the Pediatric Hydroxyurea Phase III Clinical Trial (BABY HUG). We designed a study to assess adherence with study medication administration and study visits and to evaluate socioeconomic factors (SES) that may influence these measurements of adherence. These data are important for assessing impact of adherence on BABY HUG trial outcome and defining impact of SES on adherence.
Methods
Each subject's median study medication (MedAd) and mean visit adherence (VAd) were evaluated. We examined associations of adherence with SES of participating families.
Results
MedAd data were available on 153 of the 191 subjects who started randomized study medication. MedAd was 101.7% of volume prescribed, with 88.9% of subjects taking at least 80% of doses. VAd data were available on 185 of the 191 subjects who started randomized study medication. VAd was 97.3%, with 82.2% of subjects having no missed visits. During dose titration, subjects had on average 12.9% higher medication adherence than subjects who were on a stable dose and had less frequent study visits. MedAd and VAd were not significantly associated with SES.
Conclusion
Subjects in the BABY HUG trial have had excellent adherence. SES was not associated with adherence, suggesting that SES should not be used as a criterion for enrolment in clinical trials. Additional efforts are needed to maintain medication adherence, particularly when the interval between scheduled visits increases. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006400). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010;54:260–264. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:PBC22324 The authors have no relevant conflict of interest related to this manuscript. Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act istex:B6D7ED5001BE83688E496E883F0437BCFF480CDC ark:/67375/WNG-2Q1SLQTG-G National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute/National Institutes of Health N01- - No. HB-07150-N01-HB-07160 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1545-5009 1545-5017 1545-5017 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pbc.22324 |