Multi-Criteria Project Selection Using an Extended VIKOR Method with Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets

Project selection can be a real problem of the multi-criteria group decision making if a group of decision makers express their preferences depending on the nature of the alternatives and different criteria with respect to their knowledge about them. The purpose of the project selection process is t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of information technology & decision making Vol. 14; no. 5; pp. 993 - 1016
Main Authors Ghorabaee, Mehdi Keshavarz, Amiri, Maghsoud, Sadaghiani, Jamshid Salehi, Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore World Scientific Publishing Company 01.09.2015
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Project selection can be a real problem of the multi-criteria group decision making if a group of decision makers express their preferences depending on the nature of the alternatives and different criteria with respect to their knowledge about them. The purpose of the project selection process is to analyze project viability and to approve or reject project proposals based on established criteria. Such decisions are often complex, because they require the identification, consideration and analysis of many tangible and intangible factors. This paper presents a multi-criteria group decision-making approach for project selection problem in the type-2 fuzzy environment. The proposed method is an extended version of Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method with interval type-2 fuzzy numbers; it is called type-2 fuzzy VIKOR (T2F-VIKOR). A stepwise procedure is used for ranking and evaluating the alternatives in the developed method, and the best solution is selected considering both the beneficial and nonbeneficial criteria. An illustrative example is presented to show the applicability of the proposed approach in the project selection problems, and the results are analyzed. The results are compared with some existing methods to show the validity of the extended method. We also utilize six sets of criteria weights for analyzing the stability of the proposed method. These analyses show that the obtained results of the proposed method are relatively consistent with other methods and have good stability in different criteria weights.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0219-6220
1793-6845
DOI:10.1142/S0219622015500212