Metabolic fingerprinting of in-bag dry- and wet-aged lamb with rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectroscopy

•Metabolite profile of in-bag dry-aged lamb differed from the wet-aged equivalents.•Dry-ageing produced more dipeptides and free amino acids than wet-ageing.•Different muscle types had distinct metabolic fingerprints.•Metabolic fingerprinting using REIMS is a promising tool for meat authentication....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 347; p. 128999
Main Authors Zhang, Renyu, Ross, Alastair B., Yoo, Michelle J.Y., Farouk, Mustafa M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 15.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Metabolite profile of in-bag dry-aged lamb differed from the wet-aged equivalents.•Dry-ageing produced more dipeptides and free amino acids than wet-ageing.•Different muscle types had distinct metabolic fingerprints.•Metabolic fingerprinting using REIMS is a promising tool for meat authentication. The effect of in-bag dry- and wet-ageing on metabolite profiles of lamb legs was determined using Rapid Evaporative Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (REIMS). Using orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) with REIMS, 1705 metabolite ions were identified (Q2 = 0.86) in four muscles: m. semimembranosus, m. biceps femoris, m. vastus lateralis and m. rectus femoris. A total of 663 metabolites differed between ageing methods (P < 0.05) which mainly resulted from proteolysis and lipid metabolism. Dry-aged lamb had higher pH (P = 0.016) and lower moisture content (P = 0.034) than the wet-aged. Dry-ageing produced more (P < 0.05) smaller sized metabolites including dipeptides and free amino acids and lipid oxidation metabolites compared to wet-aged equivalents. Different muscles had distinct REIMS metabolic profiles. Outcomes of this study demonstrated that REIMS can be used for authentication between in-bag dry- and wet-aged lamb based on their metabolic fingerprints.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128999