Bilateral S3 nerve stimulation, a minimally invasive alternative treatment for postoperative stress incontinence after implantation of an anterior root stimulator with posterior rhizotomy : a preliminary observation

A preliminary report. Urinary stress incontinence following implantation of an anterior root stimulator and a posterior rhizotomy is a rare complication which is difficult to treat. It is seen in patients with an open bladder neck (T9-L2 lesion). An artificial urinary sphincter is a possible treatme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSpinal cord Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 262 - 264
Main Authors EVERAERT, K, DERIE, A, VAN LAERE, M, VANDEKERCKHOVE, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing 01.04.2000
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A preliminary report. Urinary stress incontinence following implantation of an anterior root stimulator and a posterior rhizotomy is a rare complication which is difficult to treat. It is seen in patients with an open bladder neck (T9-L2 lesion). An artificial urinary sphincter is a possible treatment for this condition but has a higher failure rate in patients with neurogenic bladder disease and could complicate micturition. Ghent, Belgium. A male paraplegic patient (T9, complete lesion) aged 36 was suffering from severe urinary incontinence due to detrusor hyperreflexia. Preoperatively the bladder neck was closed on cystography. Following implantation (6/95) of an intradural anterior root stimulator with posterior rhizotomy, severe urinary stress incontinence presented. Bilateral S3 foramen leads were implanted and connected to a pulse generator. The patient has been continent with continuous stimulation of both S3 roots for 4 years, and no fatigue of the levator muscles has been seen. Preoperative urodynamics are compared to results 3 years postoperatively. Bilateral S3 stimulation is a feasible and minimally invasive treatment of urinary stress incontinence following implantation of an anterior root stimulator.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1362-4393
1476-5624
DOI:10.1038/sj.sc.3100984