Effect of devolatilization model on flame structure of pulverized coal combustion in a jet-burner system

• Published in: Journal of mechanical science and technology Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 1973 - 1979
• Main Authors: Ahn, Seongyool, Watanabe, Hiroaki, Kitagawa, Toshiaki
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Seoul Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers 01.04.2019; Springer Nature B.V; 대한기계학회
• Subjects: Coal; Combustion; Computational fluid dynamics; Control; Devolatilization; Dynamical Systems; Engineering; Flame structure; Industrial and Production Engineering; Jet flow; Mathematical models; Mechanical Engineering; Oxidation; Parameters; Pulverized coal; Simulation; Solid phases; Turbulent flow; Vibration; 기계공학; Numerical simulation; Devolatilization; LES; Pulverized coal combustion; Two competing model
• ISSN: 1738-494X; 1976-3824
• DOI: 10.1007/s12206-019-0347-5

A numerical simulation was performed with the two competing model in the devolatilization process for a pulverized coal combustion jet flame by means of LES. The target was a simple jet burner flame in CRIEPI. To solve the LES equations, a CFD code FFR. Comb was employed with the dynamic Smagorinsky SGS turbulent model. A simple global kinetic mechanism was implemented to predict combustion of the gas and solid phase combustion. The interactions between the two phases were calculated by PSI-Cell model while the reaction rate in turbulent flow was established by SSFRRM. The simulation was validated by comparing results to the experimental data in terms of particle dispersion and velocity as well as gaseous velocity. The flame structure was discussed with temperature, mole fraction of major species. In addition, the effect of the devolatilization model was investigated simultaneously by comparing to another simulation that employed the single first order reaction model because the devolatilization was one of the major processes in coal combustion and it had an influence on the flame structure from all reactive regions. The release rate was calculated by two different parameter sets in the Arrhenius rate equation for the two competing model that were corresponding different temperature regions whereas the released rate was determined by only one fixed parameter set in the single first order reaction model. From the simulation, it was revealed that the main reactions took place at the upstream and the first fuel oxidation was stronger at the inner reaction zone comparing to the far side combustion. It was confirmed as well that the two competing model could capture the quick devolatilization faster than the single first order reaction model though the dominant part appeared later than the single first order reaction model.