Conflicting and complementary notions of responsibility in caregiver's and health care workers' vaccination narratives in the Philippines

• Published in: Journal of global health Vol. 14; p. 04016
• Main Authors: Ulmido, Ma Leslie, Reñosa, Mark Donald C, Wachinger, Jonas, Endoma, Vivienne, Landicho-Guevarra, Jhoys, Landicho, Jeniffer, Bravo, Thea Andrea, Aligato, Mila, McMahon, Shannon A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland Edinburgh University Global Health Society 12.01.2024; International Society of Global Health
• Subjects: Caregivers; Children & youth; Coronaviruses; COVID-19 vaccines; Data analysis; Data collection; Decision making; Dengue fever; Ethics; Families & family life; Females; Health care; Health facilities; Health risks; Health services; Immunization; Interviews; Medical personnel; Mortality; Privacy; Public health; Qualitative research; Social norms; Social sciences; Vaccines; Philippines
• ISSN: 2047-2978; 2047-2986
• DOI: 10.7189/JOGH.14.04016

Vaccine hesitancy (VH) continues to pose a public health threat globally. Understanding the attitudes and perceptions about vaccination of key stakeholders in vaccine decision-making (such as health care workers (HCWs) and caregivers) about vaccination can pave the way toward novel approaches to bolster vaccine confidence. In this study, we explored the role of notions of responsibilities among HCWs and caregivers in shaping vaccination interactions and decision-making in the Philippines. We conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 44 vaccine-hesitant caregivers, seven HCWs, and 20 community health workers (barangay health workers) in the Philippines between August 2020 and March 2021. The interviews and focus groups were conducted online, transcribed verbatim, and analysed through the reflexive thematic analysis approach. Caregivers highlighted responsibility in terms of being a good caregiver, managing risk to one's own child, and seeking and validating information. Meanwhile, HCWs highlighted responsibility as: being a good HCW, managing risk to children and to the community, and providing and transforming information. Our findings suggest that responsibility manifests differently in HCWs' and caregivers' narratives, and that these notions can be both conflicting and complementary, shaping the interaction between stakeholders and, ultimately, their vaccine decision-making. We also found that fostering a good relationship between HCWs and caregivers through communication techniques such as motivational interviewing could help bridge the gap created by mistrust in vaccinations. HCWs sharing their own experiences as parents who vaccinate their own children also resonate with caregivers. Notions of responsibility can underpin collaborative and divisive interactions between HCWs and caregivers. Public health messaging and interventions related to vaccination must consider strategies that align with these notions to address VH.