Barefoot plantar pressure measurement in Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome

•Intramuscular Compartment Pressure (IMCP) is gold standard for diagnosis of CECS.•Patients with CECS have increased rate of plantarflexion (IFFC) after heel strike.•CECS cases appear less able to adapt foot progression angle to walking speed.•Predictive value of plantarflexion rate similar to post-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGait & posture Vol. 63; pp. 10 - 16
Main Authors Roscoe, D., Roberts, A.J., Hulse, D., Shaheen, A., Hughes, M.P., Bennett, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier B.V 01.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Intramuscular Compartment Pressure (IMCP) is gold standard for diagnosis of CECS.•Patients with CECS have increased rate of plantarflexion (IFFC) after heel strike.•CECS cases appear less able to adapt foot progression angle to walking speed.•Predictive value of plantarflexion rate similar to post-exercise IMCP.•Further studies of IFFC in presence of CECS pain symptoms now indicated. Patients with Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS) have exercise-limiting pain that subsides at rest. Diagnosis is confirmed by intramuscular compartment pressure (IMCP) measurement. Accompanying CECS, subjective changes to gait (foot slap) are frequently reported by patients. This has not previously been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in barefoot plantar pressure (BFPP) between CECS cases and asymptomatic controls prior to the onset of painful symptoms. 40 male military volunteers, 20 with symptoms of CECS and 20 asymptomatic controls were studied. Alternative diagnoses were excluded with rigorous inclusion criteria, magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic IMCP measurement. BFPP was measured during walking and marching. Data were analysed for: Stance Time (ST); foot progression angle (FPA); centre of force; plantarflexion rate after heel strike (IFFC-time); the distribution of pressure under the heel; and, the ratio between inner and outer metatarsal loading. Correlation coefficients of each variable with speed and leg length were calculated followed by ANCOVA or t-test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for IFFC-time. Caseshad shorter ST and IFFC-times than controls. FPA was inversely related to walking speed (WS) in controls only. The area under the ROC curve for IFFC-time ranged from 0.746 (95%CI: 0.636–0.87) to 0.773 (95%CI: 0.671–0.875) representing ‘fair predictive validity’. Patients with CECS have an increased speed of ankle plantarflexion after heel strike that precedes the onset of painful symptoms likely resulting from a mechanical disadvantage of Tibialis Anterior. These findings provide further insight into the pathophysiology of CECS and support further investigation of this non-invasive diagnostic. The predictive value of IFFC-time in the diagnosis of CECS is comparable to post-exercise IMCP but falls short of dynamic IMCP measured during painful symptoms.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.009