Experimental accelerated shelf life determination of a ready-to-eat processed food

The most direct way to estimate the shelf life of a product is to conduct simulation tests which are time consuming and expensive. Conversely, accelerated shelf life tests can be successfully used for stable products having long expected shelf life. The aim of the study was directed to verify the po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inItalian journal of food safety Vol. 7; no. 4; p. 6919
Main Authors Haouet, M Naceur, Tommasino, Mauro, Mercuri, Maria Lucia, Benedetti, Ferdinando, Bella, Sara Di, Framboas, Marisa, Pelli, Stefania, Altissimi, M Serena
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Italy PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 31.12.2018
PAGEPress Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The most direct way to estimate the shelf life of a product is to conduct simulation tests which are time consuming and expensive. Conversely, accelerated shelf life tests can be successfully used for stable products having long expected shelf life. The aim of the study was directed to verify the possibility to apply an accelerated shelf life test to perishable food products having a short-expected shelf life, such as a new ready-to-eat processed food preparation, composed mainly by cereals, tuna and chicken, packed in thermo-sealed trays and pasteurised. Different samples of the product were stored in thermal abuse conditions, collected periodically and subjected to determinations of TVB-N, pH and sensorial characteristics. Q and activation energy were calculated allowing to obtain a predictive evaluation of the product shelf life at the 4°C recommended temperature. The product shelf life was assessed at 26 days vs the 30 days expected by the manufacturer, showing the possibility to apply successfully ASLT for products having short shelf life, saving both time and money.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conflict of interests: the authors declare no potential conflict of interests.
ISSN:2239-7132
2239-7132
DOI:10.4081/ijfs.2018.6919