Redefining dietary fibre: potentially a recipe for disaster
Various definitions of dietary fibre that do not fulfil these criteria are in use worldwide, and there is a great need for a single, scientifically sound definition. A panel set up by the American National Academy of Sciences has proposed a definition of fibre.1 The panel proposes that dietary fibre...
Saved in:
Published in | The Lancet (British edition) Vol. 358; no. 9296; pp. 1833 - 1834 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2001
Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Various definitions of dietary fibre that do not fulfil these criteria are in use worldwide, and there is a great need for a single, scientifically sound definition. A panel set up by the American National Academy of Sciences has proposed a definition of fibre.1 The panel proposes that dietary fibre be defined as being all nondigestible carbohydrates and lignin that are intrinsic and intact in plants. This non-digestibility-based definition will include many substances not generally considered as fibre, such as resistant starch and several types of non-digestible oligosaccharides (panel). The NAS panel also proposes a second category, "added fibre", which will be isolated, non-digestible carbohydrates that have "beneficial" physiological effects in human beings. The final, total fibre value will thus be the sum of "dietary fibre" and "added fibre". |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06882-9 |