A crossover study of short daily haemodialysis

Background. The benefits of daily haemodialysis (DHD) compared to conventional three times per week haemodialysis (CHD) have been described in a number of observational studies. Most of these previous studies however have not been performed with rigorous controls. Methods. We performed a crossover s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNephrology, dialysis, transplantation Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 166 - 175
Main Authors Goldfarb-Rumyantzev, Alexander S., Leypoldt, John K., Nelson, Natalia, Kutner, Nancy G., Cheung, Alfred K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.01.2006
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. The benefits of daily haemodialysis (DHD) compared to conventional three times per week haemodialysis (CHD) have been described in a number of observational studies. Most of these previous studies however have not been performed with rigorous controls. Methods. We performed a crossover study following an A-B-A design: phase A was 4 weeks of thrice weekly dialysis, 3–4 h per treatment (CHD); phase B was 8 weeks of six times/week dialysis, each session being one-half of the usual time (DHD) and phase A with 4 weeks of thrice weekly dialysis (CHD) was repeated. Patients characteristics: n = 12, six males; age 52±18 years, six diabetics. Results. Weekly single-pool Kt/V, equilibrated Kt/V and standard Kt/V of urea, and β-2-microglobulin clearance values were greater during DHD. Eight of 12 patients who completed the study reported symptomatic benefits from DHD that partially or completely disappeared during the second period of CHD. Quality of life of patients improved during DHD. Three patients had problems with arteriovenous access during DHD. Average blood pressure was lower during DHD (systolic 139.5±22.7 mmHg) compared to the initial (147.7±21.4 mmHg, P<0.001) and last (146.4±20.0 mmHg, P<0.005) CHD periods. No significant changes in predialysis haemoglobin and the serum concentration of albumin, phosphate, β-2-microglobulin or B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP) were observed, although BNP trended downward during DHD and returned to baseline level during the second period of CHD. The dose of erythropoietin did not change significantly. Patient compliance with the dialysis schedule was lower during DHD. Dialysis staff perceived an increased workload but felt that the patients benefited medically from DHD. Conclusions. The results of this cross-over study suggest symptomatic benefits and decrease in blood pressure, but there are potential problems with compliance and vascular access during DHD.
Bibliography:local:gfi116
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Alexander S. Goldfarb-Rumyantzev, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 85 North Medical Drive, East Rm 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. Email: alex.goldfarb@hsc.utah.edu
istex:5E165FD3F3BA0F7DAF6C11062007C906348D382B
ark:/67375/HXZ-V9KZRK3H-1
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfi116