Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Assessing Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis

The objective of our study was to determine the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver parenchyma for determining the severity of liver fibrosis. This study investigated 78 patients who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 1.5-T MRI and pathologic staging of liver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 193; no. 6; pp. 1556 - 1560
Main Authors Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan, Akisik, Fatih M, Lin, Chen, Tahir, Bilal, Rajan, Janaki, Saxena, Romil, Aisen, Alex M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reston, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01.12.2009
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objective of our study was to determine the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver parenchyma for determining the severity of liver fibrosis. This study investigated 78 patients who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 1.5-T MRI and pathologic staging of liver fibrosis based on biopsy. DWI was performed with b values of 50 and 400 s/mm(2). ADCs of liver were measured using 2.0- to 3.0-cm(2) regions of interest in the right and left lobes of the liver; the mean ADC value was used for analysis. Pathologic METAVIR scores for liver fibrosis stage were used as a reference standard. The mean ADC values for fibrosis pathologically staged using the METAVIR classification system as F0 (n = 11), F1 (n = 16), F2 (n = 10), F3 (n = 14), and F4 (n = 27) were 125.9, 105.0, 104.5, 103.2, and 99.1 x 10(-5) s/mm(2), respectively. The correlation between the ADC values and the degree of liver fibrosis was moderate (Spearman's test, rho = -0.36). There was a significant difference in ADC values between patients with nonfibrotic liver (F0) and those with cirrhotic liver (F4) (p = 0.008). The best cutoff ADC value to distinguish between these groups was 118 x 10(-5) s/mm(2). However, ADC values were not useful for differentiating viral hepatitis patients with F2 fibrosis or higher from those with a lower degree of fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.66) or for differentiating low-stage fibrosis in all patients from high-stage fibrosis in all patients (AUC = 0.54). The ADCs in cirrhotic livers are significantly lower than those in nonfibrotic livers. However, ADC values measured using the current generation of scanners are not reliable enough to replace liver biopsy for staging hepatic fibrosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI:10.2214/AJR.09.2436