Anxious and Avoidant Attachment to God Predict Moral Foundations beyond Adult Attachment

Van IJzendoorn and Zwart-Woudstra (1995) and Shaver and Mikulincer (2012) have proposed that adult attachment patterns are related to moral decision-making. We explore the relationship between attachment to God (ATG) and the 5 moral foundations proposed by Haidt and Graham (2007)—care/harm, fairness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of psychology and theology Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 230 - 243
Main Authors Njus, David M, Okerstrom, Katrina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published La Mirada Sage Publications Ltd. (UK) 22.09.2016
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Anxiety
Attachment (Psychology)
Attachment behavior
Morality
Psychological aspects
Psychological research
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Van IJzendoorn and Zwart-Woudstra (1995) and Shaver and Mikulincer (2012) have proposed that adult attachment patterns are related to moral decision-making. We explore the relationship between attachment to God (ATG) and the 5 moral foundations proposed by Haidt and Graham (2007)—care/harm, fairness/reciprocity, ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity. Data from 306 adult subjects, who completed measures of adult attachment, ATG, and the 5 moral foundations, were collected online. Results revealed that attachment to God accounted for significant levels of variability in all 5 foundations above and beyond the variability accounted for by adult romantic and best friend attachment. ATG avoidance was negatively related to the care, fairness, authority, and purity foundations, while ATG anxiety was positively related to the in-group loyalty and authority foundations. Our results suggest that those with insecure attachment patterns—in this case regarding God as an attachment figure—have different moral foundation profiles.
ISSN:0091-6471
2328-1162
DOI:10.1177/009164711604400305