Systematic conservation planning in the Mediterranean: a flexible tool for the identification of no-take marine protected areas

• Published in: ICES journal of marine science Vol. 66; no. 1; pp. 137 - 146
• Main Authors: Maiorano, Luigi, Bartolino, Valerio, Colloca, Francesco, Abella, Alvaro, Belluscio, Andrea, Carpentieri, Paolo, Criscoli, Alessandro, Jona Lasinio, Giovanna, Mannini, Alessandro, Pranovi, Fabio, Reale, Bruno, Relini, Giulio, Viva, Claudio, Ardizzone, Gian Domenico
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 01.01.2009
• Subjects: Conservation; Conservation areas; Fishing; Focusing; irreplaceability; Marine; Mediterranean; no-take marine protected areas; Origins; Priorities; systematic conservation planning; vessel monitoring system; MED; no-take marine protected areas; Mediterranean; vessel monitoring system; systematic conservation planning; irreplaceability
• ISSN: 1054-3139; 1095-9289
• DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsn148

Maiorano, L., Bartolino, V., Colloca, F., Abella, A., Belluscio, A., Carpentieri, P., Criscoli, A., Jona Lasinio, G., Mannini, A., Pranovi, F., Reale, B., Relini, G., Viva, C., and Ardizzone, G. D. 2009. Systematic conservation planning in the Mediterranean: a flexible tool for the identification of no-take marine protected areas. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 137–146. We propose the use of systematic conservation planning in the Mediterranean context for the identification of no-take marine protected areas (NTMPAs). We suggest a logical framework that should be used for the identification of areas to be targeted for multispecies, spatially explicit conservation actions. Specifically, we propose seven steps: (i) definition of the study area; (ii) selection of the species or habitats to be considered; (iii) definition of the planning units; (iv) measurement of the fishing effort; (v) definition of the conservation targets; (vi) review of the existing conservation areas; (vii) selection of additional NTMPAs. Moreover, we consider the potential impact of different conservation plans on existing fishing vessels. A working example is presented, focusing on a limited number of species and on a limited study area. This framework can be easily expanded to include datasets of different origin and to accommodate larger spatial scales. Such a process involves major data-collection and capacity-building elements, and conservation of productive commercial fisheries must be a priority.