Clinical outcome and complications using a polyaxial locking plate in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures. A reliable system?

• Published in: Injury Vol. 43; no. 2; pp. 223 - 231
• Main Authors: Königshausen, M, Kübler, L, Godry, H, Citak, M, Schildhauer, T.A, Seybold, D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2012
• Subjects: Aged; Anatomical reduction; Bone Plates; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; Fracture Healing; Humans; Joint Instability - etiology; Joint Instability - prevention & control; Locking plate; Male; Medial support; Orthopedics; Polyaxial locking plate; Polyaxiality; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology; Postoperative Complications - surgery; Prospective Studies; Proximal humerus fracture; Range of Motion, Articular; Reproducibility of Results; Shoulder Fractures - complications; Shoulder Fractures - physiopathology; Shoulder Fractures - surgery; Treatment Outcome; Polyaxiality; Locking plate; Anatomical reduction; Medial support; Polyaxial locking plate; Proximal humerus fracture
• ISSN: 0020-1383; 1879-0267
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.024

Abstract Introduction The surgical treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures (ORIF) is a perpetual challenge to the surgeon. For this reason, the principle of polyaxiality was developed to provide an improved primary stability of the fracture through better anchorage of the screws, especially in osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to present clinical results with the polyaxial locking plate in the operative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in order to determine whether the technique of polyaxiality leads to better functional outcome and lower complication rates in comparison to monoaxial plates in the literature. Patients and methods Seventy-three patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically with the polyaxial locking Suture Plate™ (Arthrex® ) between 03/2007 and 06/2009. Fifty-two of the patients (mean age, 69.9 ± 12.1) were included in a radiographical and clinical examination using the Constant score (CS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH). Results The follow-up examinations were on average 13.9 ± 4.5 months (10–27 months) after surgical treatment. The mean CS of the patients was 66.0 ± 13.7 points, the age- and gender-related CS was 90.9% ± 20.0% and the mean DASH score was 23.8 ± 19.8 points for the injured side. The patients with a nearly anatomical reduction of their fracture ( n = 13) reached a significantly higher CS (75.1 ± 8.5; p = 0.004) and DASH-score (13.6 ± 11.6; p = 0.043) and none of these patients had a complication. The complications were identified in 12 (23.1%) cases, 5 of which involved loss of reduction. All of these 5 cases were lacking of initial medial column support and 4 of which were type C2.3 AO-Classification. Conclusion The data show that the combination of angular stability with the possibility of variable polyaxial screw direction is a good concept for reduction and fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures, but anatomical reduction and medial support remain important preconditions for a good outcome. However, a significantly lower rate of complications or better clinical outcome than that reported in the literature could not be found.