Gait kinetics in children with clubfeet treated surgically or with the Ponseti method: A meta-analysis

•Gait kinetics are part of the long-term functional evaluation of clubfoot treatment.•Gait kinetics of Ponseti treated clubfeet significantly differ from healthy controls.•No significant differences were found between surgically and Ponseti treated clubfeet. Currently, the Ponseti method is the gold...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGait & posture Vol. 66; pp. 94 - 100
Main Authors Tuinsma, A.B.M., Vanwanseele, B., van Oorschot, L., Kars, H.J.J., Grin, L., Reijman, M., Besselaar, A.T., van der Steen, M.C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier B.V 01.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Gait kinetics are part of the long-term functional evaluation of clubfoot treatment.•Gait kinetics of Ponseti treated clubfeet significantly differ from healthy controls.•No significant differences were found between surgically and Ponseti treated clubfeet. Currently, the Ponseti method is the gold standard for treatment of clubfeet. For long-term functional evaluation of this method, gait analysis can be performed. Previous studies have assessed gait differences between Ponseti treated clubfeet and healthy controls. The aims of this systematic review were to compare the gait kinetics of Ponseti treated clubfeet with healthy controls and to compare the gait kinetics between clubfoot patients treated with the Ponseti method or surgically. A systematic search was performed in Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, Cinahl ebsco, and Google scholar, for studies reporting on gait kinetics in children with clubfeet treated with the Ponseti method. Studies were excluded if they only used EMG or pedobarography. Data were extracted and a risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analyses and qualitative analyses were performed. Nine studies were included, of which five were included in the meta-analyses. The meta-analyses showed that ankle plantarflexor moment (95% CI -0.25 to -0.19) and ankle power (95% CI -0.89 to -0.60, were significantly lower in the Ponseti treated clubfeet compared to the healthy controls. No significant difference was found in ankle dorsiflexor and plantarflexor moment, and ankle power between clubfeet treated with surgery compared to the Ponseti method. Differences in gait kinetics are present when comparing Ponseti treated clubfeet with healthy controls. However, there is no significant difference between surgically and Ponseti treated clubfeet. These results give more insight in the possibilities of improving the gait pattern of patients treated for clubfeet.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.08.006