The outcomes of internal iliac artery preservation during endovascular or open surgery treatment for aortoiliac aneurysms

Internal iliac artery (IIA) preservation continues to be a challenge during open surgery or endovascular repair of abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAIA). To determine the results in terms of survival and clinical outcomes in patients with aortoiliac aneurysms (AAIA) treated with endovascular (EV) or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJornal vascular brasileiro Vol. 19; p. e20200087
Main Authors Soares, Rafael de Athayde, Matielo, Marcelo Fernando, Brochado, Francisco Cardoso, Palomo, Amanda Thurler, Lourenço, Rodrigo Andrade, Tanaka, Caroline, Sacilotto, Roberto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Published Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) 11.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Internal iliac artery (IIA) preservation continues to be a challenge during open surgery or endovascular repair of abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAIA). To determine the results in terms of survival and clinical outcomes in patients with aortoiliac aneurysms (AAIA) treated with endovascular (EV) or open surgical (OS) repair. This was a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients with AAIA who underwent EV or OS repair. Post-procedure hospitalization time and intensive care unit stay were both longer in the OS group than in the EV group (7.08 ± 3.5 days vs. 3.32 ± 2.3 days; p = 0.03; 3.35 ± 2.2 days vs. 1.2 ± 0.8 days; p = 0.02, respectively). There were two cases of bowel ischemia (4.7%; OS 8.3% and EV 3.2%; p = 0.48), two cases of buttock claudication (4.7%; OS 8.3% and EV 3.2%; p = 0.48), and one case of sexual dysfunction (2.3% OS), all of them in patients with bilateral occlusion of the internal iliac artery (five patients, 11.6%; p = 0.035). Overall survival at 720 days was 80.6% in the EV group and 66.7% in the OS group (p = 0.58). In the present study, OS and EV repair of aortoiliac aneurysms had similar overall survival and outcomes. Preservation of at least one internal iliac artery is associated with good results and no further complications.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest declared concerning the publication of this article.
Author contributions: Conception and design: RAS Analysis and interpretation: RAS, MFM, FCBN, RS Data collection: CT, ATP, RAL Writing the article: RAS Critical revision of the article: RAS, MFM, FCBN, RS, CT, RAL, ATP Final approval of the article*: RAS, MFM, FCBN, RS, CT, RAL, ATP Statistical analysis: RAS Overall responsibility: RAS *All authors have read and approved of the final version of the article submitted to J Vasc Bras.
Author information: RAS - PhD in Ciências da Saúde, Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (IAMSPE); Full member, Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV); Board certified, SBACV in Cirurgia Vascular, Ecografia Vascular and Cirurgia Endovascular; Primary physician, vascular surgery service, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. MFM and FCBN - PhD, Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Preceptors, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. ATP and CT - Vascular surgeons, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. RAL - Cirurgia Vascular resident, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo. RS - PhD, Universidade de São Paulo (USP); Vascular and endovascular surgery service director, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo.
ISSN:1677-5449
1677-7301
1677-7301
DOI:10.1590/1677-5449.200087