Glycaemic control is positively associated with prevalent fractures but not with bone mineral density in patients with Type 1 diabetes

Diabet. Med. 28, 872–875 (2011) Aim  There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type 1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods  A single‐centre, cross‐sectional study of men and pre‐menopausa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetic medicine Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 872 - 875
Main Authors Neumann, T., Sämann, A., Lodes, S., Kästner, B., Franke, S., Kiehntopf, M., Hemmelmann, C., Lehmann, T., Müller, U. A., Hein, G., Wolf, G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2011
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0742-3071
1464-5491
1464-5491
DOI10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03286.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Diabet. Med. 28, 872–875 (2011) Aim  There are conflicting data regarding the risk of osteoporosis in patients with Type 1 diabetes. We investigated an association between diabetes, bone mineral density and prevalent fractures. Methods  A single‐centre, cross‐sectional study of men and pre‐menopausal women with Type 1 diabetes (n = 128) and a matched control group (n = 77) was conducted. The primary outcome measure was bone mineral density and secondary measures were markers of bone metabolism and prevalent fractures. Results  Hip and total body bone mineral densities were significantly lower in women with diabetes compared with control subjects. In men, no difference in bone mineral density was found. A multivariate regression analysis in women with diabetes revealed higher BMI as the strongest predictor of higher total hip, femoral neck and total body bone mineral density, whereas previous fractures were inversely associated with total hip bone mineral density and C‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen with total body bone mineral density. Poor long‐term glycaemic control was not associated with low bone mineral density. Fracture frequency was higher in patients with diabetes compared with control subjects (1.64 vs. 0.62 per 100 patient‐years; P < 0.05). In a multivariable model, long‐term HbA1c control was associated with increased clinical fracture prevalence (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.09–2.75) in those with diabetes. Conclusions  Type 1 diabetes contributes to low bone mineral density in women. Previous fractures and low BMI were strong predictors of impaired bone mineral density and should therefore be considered in risk estimation. Fractures are more frequent in Type 1 diabetes. Long‐term hyperglycaemia may account for impaired bone strength, independently from bone mineral density.
Bibliography:istex:2EB5948F0EF96507875D67A361D2931416D5881C
ArticleID:DME3286
ark:/67375/WNG-DBRW1L80-J
These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0742-3071
1464-5491
1464-5491
DOI:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03286.x