Microhardness under strain. III. Microhardness behavior during stress-induced polymorphic transition in blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) and its block copolymers

The microhardness (H) technique was recently applied to poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and its multiblock copolymer of poly(ether ester) (PEE) type for examination of the stress‐induced polymorphic transition. In the present study, these investigations are extended to blends of PBT and PEE. For...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied polymer science Vol. 69; no. 11; pp. 2271 - 2276
Main Authors Boneva, D., Calleja, F. J. Baltá, Fakirov, S., Apostolov, A. A., Krumova, M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 12.09.1998
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-8995
1097-4628
DOI10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980912)69:11<2271::AID-APP20>3.0.CO;2-0

Cover

More Information
Summary:The microhardness (H) technique was recently applied to poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and its multiblock copolymer of poly(ether ester) (PEE) type for examination of the stress‐induced polymorphic transition. In the present study, these investigations are extended to blends of PBT and PEE. For this purpose, drawn and annealed with fixed ends at 170°C for 6 h in vacuum bristles of PBT–PEE, blends were characterized with respect to their microhardness at various stages of tensile deformation. H was measured under stress, with each step of deformation amounting 5%. The variation of H with strain (ε) shows 2 sharp stepwise decreasing values (by 40%). Each step is defined in a relatively narrow deformation (ε) range (2–5%) due to the stress‐induced α → β polymorphic transitions arising in PBT crystallites. The first polymorphic transition (at ε = 2–3%) is assigned to the PBT crystallites of the homopolymer (homoPBT). The second transition (at ε = 25%) is associated to those crystals within the PEE copolymer. From the observation of two distinct transitions, separated by a deformation interval of ε = 20% it is concluded that (1) homoPBT and the PBT segments from PEE crystallize separately (no cocrystallization takes place), and (2) the 2 species of PBT crystallites are subject to the external mechanical loading, not in a simultaneous manner, but in a two‐stage process. In the deformation range between the 2 transitions (ε = 2–3% and 25%), it is pointed out that conformational changes are induced through stretching, mainly in the amorphous regions. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 69: 2271–2276, 1998
Bibliography:DGES, Spain
NATO - No. CRG 920985; No. NIG 951394
istex:BC23C4C6AD6FF26740CC32C77EA43C88DA757CF2
ArticleID:APP20
ark:/67375/WNG-V7VLCCNV-5
DGICYT, Spain - No. PB94-0049
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-8995
1097-4628
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980912)69:11<2271::AID-APP20>3.0.CO;2-0