A mixed methods study examining neighborhood disadvantage and childhood behavior problems in Montevideo, Uruguay

• Published in: International journal of hygiene and environmental health Vol. 235; p. 113753
• Main Authors: Frndak, Seth, Gallo, Yanina, Queirolo, Elena I., Barg, Gabriel, Mañay, Nelly, Kordas, Katarzyna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany Elsevier GmbH 01.06.2021
• Subjects: Child; Child behavior; Construct validity; Cross-Sectional Studies; Ethnicity; Global south; Humans; Mixed methodology; Multilevel modeling; Neighborhood disadvantage; Problem Behavior; Residence Characteristics; United States; Uruguay; United States; Uruguay; Construct validity; Mixed methodology; Neighborhood disadvantage; Global south; Multilevel modeling; Child behavior
• ISSN: 1438-4639; 1618-131X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113753

Neighborhood disadvantage (ND) is a risk factor for child behavior problems (CBPs), but is understudied outside the United States and Europe. Our mixed methods study aims to (1) create a culturally meaningful measure of ND, (2) test cross-sectional associations between ND and CBPs and (3) qualitatively explore life in the neighborhoods of families participating in the Salud Ambiental Montevideo (SAM) study. The quantitative study (Study 1) comprised 272, ~7-year-old children with geolocation and complete data on twelve behavioral outcomes (Conner's Teachers Rating Scale – Revised Short Form: CTRS-R:S and Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning: BRIEF). A ND factor was created at the census segment level (1,055 segments) with 19 potential indicators of ND downloaded from the Municipality of Montevideo Geographic Services. Children were assigned ND scores based on the location of their household within a census segment. Multilevel models tested associations between ND and all CBP scales, controlling for confounders at the individual level. The qualitative study (Study 2) comprised 10 SAM caregivers. Photovoice alongside semi-structured interviews in Spanish were used to foster conversations about neighborhood quality, activities, and raising children. Thematic analysis with inductive coding was used to summarize qualitative study findings. The ND factor consisted of 12 census-based indicators related to education, employment, ethnicity, housing quality, and age characteristics, but unrelated to home ownership and some ethnicity variables. In multivariable models, ND was associated with greater conduct problems (β = 1.37, p < .05), poor shifting (β = 1.56, p < .01) and emotional control problems (β = 2.36, p < .001). Photovoice and semi-structured interviews yielded four themes: physical disorder, recreation, safety and crime, and community resources. Residents discussed improving waste management and transportation, updating playgrounds, and ensuring neighborhood safety. ND in Montevideo comprised a unique set of census indicators. ND was primarily related to behavioral regulation problems. Hypothesized pathways whereby ND affects CBPs are discussed. •Created a neighborhood disadvantage (ND) factor in Montevideo, Uruguay.•Assessed construct validity and associations with child behavior problems.•Valid ND factor associated with conduct, shifting and emotional control problems.•Qualitative study addressed neighborhood characteristics, resources and problems.•Qualitative data led to hypotheses linking ND and child behavior in Montevideo.